Friday, May 18, 2012
Home
Free Account
License Plans
Live Demos
Take a Tour
Knowledge Center
About
The Team
Where to Find us
Partners
My Account
Take a Tour
Survey Analysis and Reporting in the Cloud
Application Portal Login
Statistics
Data modeling
Using inferential statistics
Drobots User Manual
Tutorial videos
Watch how to setup a survey and to load data
Analyze survey questions
Lists
Frequencies
Means
Advanced statistical survey analysis
Smart cross tables
Calculating Facet / Concept Means
Ranking facets / concepts
Analyzing correlations between variables
Most impacting variables
Compare groups of respondents
Load data into Drobots
Viewing your questionnaire in Drobots
View your data model
Selecting data for analysis
Analyzing survey population
Simple Application Overview
Most impacting variables
Created by jdeboel on 10/26/2010 11:23:46 AM
The
” Impact diagram » Correlation
” analysis is used to represent the mean values of the various facets in relation to the correlation with the study’s dependent variable (sometimes multiple variables). The higher on the vertical axis, the higher the mean score.
The unique part about this graph is that it also shows the strength of the relationship (or correlation) with the dependent variable. (the horizontal axis) The more to the right, the higher the correlation.
In the graph, there is no distinction between concepts. All facets for all concepts are shown.
Below the graph you are presented with a table that lists all facets. For each of these facets you can see the concept they belong to, you can see their true value, the Pearson correlation-coefficient, and a conclusion.
An example:
A course satisfaction study (see “DEMO” dataset) is set up by a university to find out what students think about the quality of the education the school offers.
When analysing the results using a correlation impact diagram, the researcher will conclude that in this particular survey, “Tests” scores best and “Course” and “Openness” have lesser results.(according to their vertical position) But also, very importantly, the researcher will see that “Exercises” and “Openness” have the most impact on the “Global satisfaction” dependent variable. So, one could say that since “Openness” has the biggest impact on the global satisfaction score; the “Openness”- aspect of this questionnaire is perceived as
the most important aspect
to help shape the global satisfaction with the school.
Seeing as the worst scoring facet has the biggest impact on the global satisfaction, one could say “the school has a big problem”. Or “the school should invest in improving the Openness facet, to very quickly improve the global satisfaction of its students”. On the other hand, the opposite could be said about the “Exercises” facet.
Drobots also offers regression analysis to measure the impact of concepts.
Correlation and regression analyses are a lot alike. The main difference is that regression analyses calculates the unique contribution of each independent variable to the dependent variable; and correlation doesn’t take this into account. The “Impact diagram » Regression” analysis is used to represent the mean values of the various concepts. The higher on the vertical axis, the higher the mean score.
The unique part about this graph is that it also shows the strength of the causal relationship (or regression) with the dependent variable. (the horizontal axis) The more to the right, the higher the impact.
If there is more than one concept in the selected dataset, you can select the concept you want to evaluate at the top of the page. Next to “Select Dependent Concept:”.
Below the graph you are presented with a table that lists all concepts. For each of these concepts you can read their true value, the standardized OLS regression coefficient, and a conclusion.
An example:
A course satisfaction study (see “DEMO” dataset) is set up by a university to find out what students think about the quality of the education the school offers.
When analysing the results using a regression impact diagram, the researcher will conclude that in this particular survey, “Tests” scores best and “Material” and “Staff” have lesser results.(according to their vertical position) But also, very importantly, the researcher will see that “Staff” has the most impact on the “Global Satisfaction” split variable. So, one could say that since “Staff” has the biggest impact on the global satisfaction score; the “Staff”- aspect of this questionnaire (= quality of teachings, behavior of professors,…) is perceived as the most important aspect to help shape the global satisfaction with the school.
Seeing as the worst scoring facets have the biggest impact on the global satisfaction, one could say “the school has a big problem”. Or “the school should invest in improving the Staff and Material facets, to very quickly improve the global satisfaction of its students”.
Comments
Copyright 2009 - 2012 by Kpiware - Powered by
Webmove
Terms of use
Privacy statement